Supreme Court · 2017 INSC 629 · Decided 17 July 2017

Lahu Shrirang Gatkal v. State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary and ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2017 INSC 629 · [2017] 6 S.C.R. 389
Case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1185/2017
Decided
17 July 2017
Bench
N.V. RAMANA, PRAFULLA C. PANT (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Criminal

Headnote

A B Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons, Video Pirates, C Sand Smugglers and Persons engaged in Black marketing of Essential Commodities Act, 1981: s.3(2) - Detention order - Period of detention not specified Held: it is well settled that a presumptive legislation such as the present Act needs to be given a strict interpretation - Proviso to sub-section (2) of s.3 envisages a period to be specified in the order with a maximum cap D of six months at the first instance - Therefore authorities could not

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)