Supreme Court · 1994 INSC 565 · Decided 30 November 1994
L. V Asantha Kumari v. Balammal and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1994 INSC 565 · [1994] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 215
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1911/1984
- Decided
- 30 November 1994
- Bench
- K. RAMASWAMY, N. VENKATACHALA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
Kera/a Land Reforms Act, 1964: Section 2(25) Explanation H-A~'Kudikidappukaran'-Meaning of­ Any one satisfying the requirements of Explanation II-A and its proviso A B would be deemed 'Kudikidappukaran '. C Words and Phrases: 'Kudikidappukaran '-Meaning of-In the context of Kera/a Land Reforms to purchase the said property from V. Based on . that, he filed a suit for specific performance which was decreed and u'ttimately confirmed by the High Court. Thereafter the respondents filed a suit for possession on the ground that the appellant trespassed into the land and the hut and therefore,
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)