Supreme Court · 2000 INSC 162 · Decided 28 March 2000
Kush Sahgal and ORS. v. M.C. Mitter and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2000 INSC 162 · [2000] 2 S.C.R. 648
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 2274/2000
- Decided
- 28 March 2000
- Bench
- S. SAGHIR AHMAD, DORAISWAMY RAJU (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
Rent Control and Eviction : U.P. Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972/United Pmvinces (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947- Section 43(2)(rr)/43(2) (r)-Applicability of-On grounds of bonafide require­ ment pennission granted under section 3 of the under section 21((1) & (2) of the new Act­ Then prescribed authority does not require to be satisfied afresh of existence of those gmunds-Furthe1; section 43(2)(rr) is attracted if the bonafide require­ ment of residential building is not for business purposes-On fact, pennission
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)