Supreme Court · 1997 INSC 211 · Decided 28 February 1997
Krishnakant Raghunath Bibhavnekar v. State of Maharashtra and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1997 INSC 211 · [1997] 2 S.C.R. 591
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1868/1997
- Decided
- 28 February 1997
- Bench
- K. RAMASWAMY, SUJATA V. MANOHAR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 409; Constitution
Headnote
BIBHAVNEKAR A v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. FEBRUARY 28, 1997 (K. RAMASWAMY AND SUJATA V. MANOHAR, JJ.) B Service Law : Maharashtra Civil Services (Joining Time, Foreign Services, and Pay­ ment during suspension, Dismissal and Removal) Rules, 1991: Rules 72(3), 72(5) and in service-Claim for consequnetial benefits rejected c by Tribunal:--lfeld, the very cause for suspension of petitioner was his conduct D that led to prosecution of him-Though prosecution may end in acquittal on appreciation or lack of sufficient evidence, grant of consequential benefits with
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)