Supreme Court · 1996 INSC 968 · Decided 29 August 1996
Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti v. Ashok Kumar Dinesh Chandra and ANR. ETC. ETC.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1996 INSC 968 · [1996] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 352
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1678/1982
- Decided
- 29 August 1996
- Bench
- M.M. PUNCHHI, SUJATA V. MANOHAR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 226
Headnote
Constitution of India, 1950. Art. 226-W!it petition claiming that Mandi Samitis not providing C services and so no market fee is chargeable-Mandi Samitis claimed that certain services were rendered and some more services are likely to be rendered in further--High Cowt remitted the matter back to the w1it petitioners-On appeal held, the High Cowt should have gone into the question itself as to whether the claim of the Samitis in rendeling se1vices was authentic or not, or else should D have gone by the word of the Sa mi tis that they were rendeling such ser­ vices-Not to have
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)