Supreme Court · 2010 INSC 883 · Decided 15 December 2010
Kootha Perumal v. State TR. Inspector of Police, Vigilance & Anti Corruption
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2010 INSC 883 · [2010] 14 S.C.R. 864
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1923/2008
- Decided
- 15 December 2010
- Bench
- B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, S.S. NIJJAR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7, 13(2)
Headnote
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: ss. 7 and 13(2) rlw s. 13(1}{d) and 19- Demand of illegal gratification - Trap laid - Accused caught red handed - Conviction by trial court - Affirmed by High Court - Pleas that 0 the sanction order was not there was no demand of bribe made by accused - HELD: The sanctioning authority adverted to all necessary facts and duly recorded its satisfaction that the accused should be prosecuted - Both the courts below analysed the entire E evidence and clearly held that a demand was definitely made by the
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)