Supreme Court · 2005 INSC 571 · Decided 17 November 2005

Kishore Chandra Samal v. The Divisional MANAGER. Orissa State Cashew Development Corporation LTD. Dhenkanal

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2005 INSC 571 · [2005] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 293
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 5458/2004
Decided
17 November 2005
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT, R.V. RAVEENDRAN (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Dismissed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Industrial Disputes Act Section 2(oo)(bb), 25

Headnote

A B Industrial Disputes Act, 1947-Sections 2(oo)(bb) and 25-F­ Retrenchment-Termination of workman appointed for a ftxed period, after C expiry of said period-Held: Does not amount to retrenchment. Appellant was appointed for fixed ·f>erioos from time to time. When no further ceased. Alleging that refusal of work amounted to retrenchment, he raised Industrial dispute. Labour Court held that-termination of·his'•service was illegal and directed his D reinstatement~ Higl:tFCourt'fleld'that since'the engagements were for fixed period, award of the Labour

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)