Supreme Court · 2010 INSC 378 · Decided 8 July 2010
Khazia Mohammed Muzammil v. The State of Karnataka and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2010 INSC 378 · [2010] 7 S.C.R. 1061
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 596/2007
- Decided
- 8 July 2010
- Bench
- B.S. CHAUHAN, SWATANTER KUMAR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 136, 235; Service Rules
Headnote
Kamataka Civil Service (Probation) Rules, 1977: 'A .. Rule 5(2) - Deemed confirmation - Held· Rule 5(2) c provides that competent authority has to examine the suitability of the probationer and upon recording satisfaction issue an order of confirmation - ·Thus in the absence of confirmation - Delay in issuance of order would ndt·entitfe tfrEf propationer D to be deemed to have satisfactorily completed his prObation - On facts, Probation period of 2 years and the Probatib.ner­ Judicial officer discharged from service after 3 years and 10 months of
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)