Supreme Court · 1952 INSC 10 · Decided 27 February 1952

Kathi Raning Rawat v. The State of Saurashtra

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1952 INSC 10 · [1952] 1 S.C.R. 435
Case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 15/1951
Decided
27 February 1952
Bench
M. PATANJALI SASTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA, SUDHI RANJAN DAS, SIR SYED FAZL ALI, N. CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR, VIVIAN BOSE (7-judge bench)
Case type
Criminal
Acts & sections cited
IPC Section 302, 307, 392; Constitution

Headnote

COURT REPORTS 435 bona fide, even if good faith can be held to be a defence at all in a proceeding for contempt. What is more, he did not express any regret for what he had done either in the High Court or before us and his behaviour Joes not show the least trace of contrition. In these RAWAT ti. THE STATE OF SAURASHTRA [PATANJALI SASTRI c. J., FAZL ALI, MEHAR CHAND ~1h.IHJAN, MuKERJEA, DAs, CHANDRASEKH.,RA A1Y AR and VIVIAN BosE JJ.] Saurasiitra State Public Safety (Third Amendment) Orditzanu (LXVI of 1949), ss. 9, 10, 11-Law empowering State to constitute Special

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)