Supreme Court · 1997 INSC 269 · Decided 14 March 1997
Kashinath S. Bandekar and ORS. v. Atmaram Vassudeva Naique and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1997 INSC 269 · [1997] 2 S.C.R. 1075
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 6205/1990
- Decided
- 14 March 1997
- Bench
- A.S. ANAND, K. VENKATASWAMI (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 515, 516
Headnote
Portuguese Civil Procedure Code-Articles 515, 516-Suit for posses­ sion of property-Especificacacr-Record of settlement-Validity-It is only a A H step in proceedings of the trial with a view to na"ow down the controver­ sy-Though it has a probative value but it cannot be prefe"ed has to be decided· at the trial not withstanding the record of the especificacao-Civil Courts Act, 1965. In July 1961, respondents, filed a civil suit for declaration that they were the owners and possessors of the suit properties. The trial court on D the basis of pleading and
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)