Supreme Court · 1963 INSC 184 · Decided 29 August 1963
Karam Singh Sobti & ANR. v. Shri Pratap Chand & ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1963 INSC 184 · [1964] 4 S.C.R. 647
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 392/1963
- Decided
- 29 August 1963
- Bench
- S.K. DAS, A.K. SARKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Prevention of Corruption Act Section 5(3); Rent Control Act Section 57, 35
Headnote
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 647 referred to in els. (a), (b) or ( d) of sub-s. ( 1) in respect of which there was no charge against the ap­ pellant. We consider that the above argument of learned Coun­ sel for the appellant is corre~t and must be accepted." The appellant's Counsel is not in charged. We have therefore come to the conclusion that the facts proved in this case raise a presumption under s. 5(3) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and the appellant's conviction of the offence with which he was charged must be maintained on the basis of that presumption. In this view of
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)