Supreme Court · 2000 INSC 362 · Decided 28 July 2000
Kamal Pushp Enterprises v. D.R. Construction Company
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2000 INSC 362 · [2000] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 20
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 2235/1998
- Decided
- 28 July 2000
- Bench
- M. JAGANNADHA RAO, DORAISWAMY RAJU (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Contract Act; Arbitration Act Section 8(2), 14(2)
Headnote
Partnership Act, 1932 : Section 69-Unregisteredfirm-Prohibition against-Scope and extent of prohibition. Agreement between appellant and respondent-Respondent an unregis­ tered firm-Dispute between appellant and respondent-Reference to Arbitra­ tor at the instance of appellant-Award in of Court-Objection by appellant that respondent cannot defend proceedings in view of the bar contained under Section 69- Held not maintainable-Prohibition contained in Section 69 is in respect of instituting a proceeding to enforce a right arising under a contract-It had no application before
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)