Supreme Court · 2006 INSC 506 · Decided 11 August 2006
Kamal Kumar Dutta and ANR. v. Ruby General Hospital LTD. and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2006 INSC 506 · [2006] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 462
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 3471/2006
- Decided
- 11 August 2006
- Bench
- H.K. SEMA, A.K. MATHUR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC; Companies Act Section 397, 398
Headnote
letters Patent Appeal: Civil Procedure Code, 1980; Section lOOA-Appeal-Vested right-C'essation of-Held, can be taken aw~ by a subsequent enactment either expressly or by necessary intendment, after the insertion of section I OOA where appeal has been decided from an original order by a single be there under the Letters Patent of the High Court has been subsequently withdrawn. Interpretation of statutes; Statement by the law Minister made on the floor of the House or the E letter of the Law Minister-Held: change the words and intendment of a Statute which is borne out from the words
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)