Supreme Court · 2010 INSC 497 · Decided 11 August 2010

Kalpnath Singh v. Udai Nath & ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2010 INSC 497 · [2010] 9 S.C.R. 811
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 6520/2010
Decided
11 August 2010
Bench
ALTAMAS KABIR, A.K. PATNAIK (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Constitution Article 226

Headnote

Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963: A B rr. 9(2)(a),(b) and (e) and 6(1)(g) - Sand mining lease - c Preference to members of Socially and Educational Backward Classes - HELD: Preference to the persons mentioned in clause (e) of sub-rule (2) of r.9 is to be given if such person in clauses (a), (b), (c) and (d) of sub-rule(2) - In the instant case, since 0 the appellant had more experience in mining operations and bfltter financial resources than respondent no. 1, as specified in clauses (a) and (b) of r.9(2), State Government was fully within its powers to decide to

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)