Supreme Court · 2014 INSC 238 · Decided 1 April 2014

Kalpesh Hemantbhai Shah v. Manhar Auto Stores Through Its Partner & ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2014 INSC 238 · [2014] 5 S.C.R. 20
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 4266/2014
Decided
1 April 2014
Bench
S. J. MUKHOPADHAYA, KURIAN JOSEPH (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Constitution Article 226, 227; Rent Control Act; Maharashtra Rent Control Act Section 7(5)

Headnote

C Constitution of India. 1950 Articles 226, 227 - Jurisdiction of High Court under - Held: High Court u/Article 227 has jurisdiction to correct the error if apparent on the face of the record - However, u/Articles 226 and 227, it has no jurisdiction to interfere with of fact arrived at D by an appellate court - In the instant case, claim of the appellant-landlord to use the premises for personal necessity was a question of fact which was decided by the appellate court in favour of landlord on appreciation of evidence - The appellate court came to a definite

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)