Supreme Court · 2005 INSC 253 · Decided 4 May 2005
Kailash Chand and ANR. v. Dharam Dass
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2005 INSC 253 · [2005] 3 S.C.R. 1182
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 390/2004
- Decided
- 4 May 2005
- Bench
- R.C. LAHOTI, Y.K. SABHARWAL, G.P. MATHUR (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Rent Control Act Section 14(3)(a)(i)
Headnote
Rent Control and Eviction : c Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987: Section 14(3)(a)(i), third proviso-Application and interpretation of~ Held: Proviso is applicable when eviction order is passed under clause (a) or (b) and landlord obtains possession pursuant to that order-Proviso does if requirement changes or new requirement unrelated to previous D one comes into existence landlord would yet be denied relief under section­ On facts, by way of compromise, exchange of accommodation, landlord in possession of another residential building without intervention of court­
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)