Supreme Court · 2004 INSC 688 · Decided 1 December 2004
K. Raghunath v. Chandrasekhar and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2004 INSC 688 · [2004] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 590
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 4533/2001
- Decided
- 1 December 2004
- Bench
- B.P. SINGH, ARUN KUMAR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Rent Control Act Section 22(1)
Headnote
Rent Control & Eviction : Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 : Section 22(1), (h) & (p). Rules framed under-Rule 9-Revision petition-Limitation for filing of-Non-payment of arrears of rent before filing of revision- Landlord filed eviction petition against tenant under Section 22(1)(h) & neither deposited nor paid arrears of rent before filing revision petition-But he sent the amount by money order to the landlord on 11.4.2000-However, High Court dismissed the revision petition on 13.4.2000-Correctness of-Held: Section 50 does not prescribe a limitation period for
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)