Supreme Court · 1996 INSC 1511 · Decided 18 December 1996
Jasp Al Singh and ANR. v. Union of India and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1996 INSC 1511 · [1996] SUPP. 10 S.C.R. 368
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1741/1986
- Decided
- 18 December 1996
- Bench
- K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Land Acquisition Act Section 4(1)
Headnote
LandAcquisitionAct, 1894: Section 23(1) Clause Fourthly and Fifthly. Land Acquisition-Compensation-Principle for detennination of-Ac- C quisition of large track of land for extension of cantonm.ent in Amrit­ sal"-Compensation for loss of profits to appellant's poultry-The mere fact~ that a poultry f ann business anywhere, cannot be a ground under clause fourthly of Section 23(1) to detennine the compen­ sation on that basis-His loss of earnings till date of resettlement should not D be detennined in that behalf-Clause fifthly is only consequence of acquisi­ tion
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)