Supreme Court · 2010 INSC 662 · Decided 30 September 2010

Iyasamy & ANR. v. Special Tahsildar, Lano Acquisition

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2010 INSC 662 · [2010] 12 S.C.R. 489
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 1760/2004
Decided
30 September 2010
Bench
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, ANIL R. DAVE (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Disposed off
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Land Acquisition Act

Headnote

A B . LAND Acau1smoN Acr, 1894 - ss. 4, 23(2) and 23(1A) - Land acquired - Compensation awarded - Quantum of C compensation determined by High Court - In some cases interest on solatium u/s 23(2) and additional compensation u/s 23(1A) were denied - On appeal, held: The quantum of Court is correct- However, claimants are entitled to interest on solatium and additional 0 interest. Land of the appellants was acquired under Land· Acquisition Act, 1894. Compensation was awarded by· Land Acquisition Officer. The Reference Court enhanced the compensation and fixed

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)