Supreme Court · 2017 INSC 369 · Decided 19 April 2017
Indus Mobile Distribution Private Limited v. Datawind Innovations Private Limited & ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2017 INSC 369 · [2017] 4 S.C.R. 744
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 5370/2017
- Decided
- 19 April 2017
- Bench
- PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, R.F. NARIMAN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Disposed off
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 16to21; Arbitration Act Section 20
Headnote
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - s.20 - Juri::diction for regulating arbitral proceedings - Seat of arbitration fixed at C Mumbai - Whether exclusive jurisdiction clause in an agreement stating that the courts at Mumbai alone would have jurisdiction in arising between the parties under the agreement would oust all other courts - Held: Once the seat of arbitration is fixed, it would be in nature of an exCZusive jurisdiction clause as to the courts which exercise supervisory powers over the arbitration - D Any claim for reme({Y is agreed to be
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)