Supreme Court · 2021 INSC 34 · Decided 20 January 2021
In Re: Advocate on Record Includes A Proprietary Firm ETC. v. .
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2021 INSC 34 · [2021] 2 S.C.R. 308
- Case number
- WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 1107/2020
- Decided
- 20 January 2021
- Bench
- SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, DINESH MAHESHWARI, HRISHIKESH ROY (3-judge bench)
- Case type
- Writ / Constitutional
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 32
Headnote
Legal Profession - Advocate-on-Record - Letter-head and Vakaltnama of - Petitioner-Advocate-on-Record (Siddharth Murarka) seeking to state / refer, on his letter head and Vakalatnama, his Law Chambers as a by his name and registration number - If permissible - Held: The expression "Law Chambers" has been borrowed from England where it is a reference to a particular lawyer in whose chambers people may have been working and carrying on the legal practice -
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)