Supreme Court · 2003 INSC 105 · Decided 19 February 2003

Imdad Ali v. Keshav Chand and ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2003 INSC 105 · [2003] 2 S.C.R. 259
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 13275/1996
Decided
19 February 2003
Bench
V.N. KHARE, S.B. SINHA, AR. LAKSHMANAN (3-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Rent Control Act

Headnote

B Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961: s. 12(3), proviso-Shop-Tenant committing default in payment of rent­ Availing benefit of proviso to sub-section (3) of s.12-His heirs who inherited C the tenancy again committed default-Suit by landlord for eviction-Decreed-­ Held, once the benefit was not available to respondent-tenants on committing a farther default in payment of rent-When the heirs of a tenant acquire benefit under the Act, the same would be subject to such limitation D and liability which has been provided under the Act-A successor-in-interest holds his

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)