Supreme Court · 2017 INSC 231 · Decided 10 March 2017
Imax Corporation v. M/S E-City Entertainment (I) PVT. LTD.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2017 INSC 231 · [2017] 4 S.C.R. 833
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 3885/2017
- Decided
- 10 March 2017
- Bench
- S.A. BOBDE, ASHOK BHUSHAN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Arbitration Act Section 34
Headnote
A B Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: s.34 - Petition under, maintainability before Indian courts - Jn the instant case, ICC Rules were chosen by parties to govern arbitration proceedings - C International Court of Arbitration decided that London would be ·juridical seat of Rules - Held: The parties did not choose the place of arbitration - There was however an agreement to have the arbitration conducted according to the ICC rules and thus a willingness that the seat of arbitration may be outside India - In any case, the parties having D agreed to have the seat
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)