Supreme Court · 2019 INSC 1035 · Decided 16 September 2019
Huda v. Vidya Chetal
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2019 INSC 1035 · [2019] 12 S.C.R. 516
- Case number
- SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No. 4272/2015
- Decided
- 16 September 2019
- Bench
- N.V. RAMANA, MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, AJAY RASTOGI (3-judge bench)
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Consumer Protection Act Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(g), 2(1)(o)
Headnote
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - ss.2(1)(d)-(g), 2(1)(o) - Interpretation of - Law laid down by Supreme Court in HUDA vs. Sunita holding that the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) to adjudicate the legality behind the demand of "composition fee" and "extension fee" made by HUDA, as the same being statutory obligation, does not qualify as "deficiency in service" - Validity of - Held: Certain statutory dues, such as fees,
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)