Supreme Court · 2012 INSC 466 · Decided 11 October 2012
Hindustan Copper LTD. v. Monarch Gold Mining CO. LTD.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2012 INSC 466 · [2012] 9 S.C.R. 293
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 7449/2012
- Decided
- 11 October 2012
- Bench
- RAJENDRA MAL LODHA, ANIL R. DAVE (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution; Arbitration Act Section 11
Headnote
ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996: A B s. 11 (6) - Application for appointment of arbitrator - c Designate Judge holding that the request for appointment of arbitrator was proper, and then referring the matter to the Delegate of Chief Justice for appointment of arbitrator - Held: The High Court with regard to the consideration of the applications uls 11 is legally D impermissible - The piecemeal consideration of the application u/s 11 by the Designate Judge and another Designate Judge or the Chief Justice, as the case may be, is not contemplated bys. 11 - The function of the
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)