Supreme Court · 2016 INSC 205 · Decided 23 February 2016
Hina v. Union of India & ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2016 INSC 205 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1115
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1676/2016
- Decided
- 23 February 2016
- Bench
- KURIAN JOSEPH, R.F. NARIMAN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
1115 HINA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Civil Appeal NO. 1676 OF 2016) FEBRUARY 23, 2016 [KURIAN JOSEPH AND ROHINDTON FALi NARIMAN JJ.] Public Distribution - Allotment of outlet of petroleum/diesel dealership - Rejected on the ground that the age proof provided by the applicant was not of the - Respondent-Corporation is directed to conduct the selection afresh. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The requirement of the Corporation is only a proof regarding the age. No doubt, certain documents are specified in the Eligibility Criteria which would be accepted by the Corporation as
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)