Supreme Court · 2012 INSC 147 · Decided 23 March 2012
Heinz India PVT. LTD. & ANR. v. State of U.P. & ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2012 INSC 147 · [2012] 3 S.C.R. 898
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1476/2006
- Decided
- 23 March 2012
- Bench
- T.S. THAKUR, DIPAK MISRA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
The Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964: ss. 2(h), 32 and 33 of the Act read with r.133-A of the Rules framed under the Act - Market fee - Levy of - Assessment and adjudicatory machinery - Held: Dealers aggrieved of an order of assessment or an order declining 0 refund of the fee the correctness of any such demand in terms of s.32 which is in the nature of a revisional power vested in the Board - The power vested in the Board including that u/s 32 of the Act could be exercised by the Director as a delegate of the Board E keeping in view the provisions of s. 33 of the
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)