Supreme Court · 1996 INSC 667 · Decided 10 May 1996

Hashmattullah v. State of M.P. and ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1996 INSC 667 · [1996] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 755
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 8250/1996
Decided
10 May 1996
Bench
A.M. AHMADI, N.P. SINGH, B.N. KIRPAL (3-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Constitution Article 19(1)(g), 48, 19(6)

Headnote

B M.P. I0ishik Pashu Parirakshan (Sanshodhan) Adhiniyam, 1991: Sec­ tion 4(l)(a). Total ban on slaughter of bulls and bullocks-Even if they became unfit C for breeding, draught, milch or other purposes-Held: violative of Articles 19(1 )(g) and 48 of Constitu.tion of India. Constitution of deciding-Held : mere view of author not based on scientifically collected data from reliable source, could not Jami basis of decision of Court-Writ Court should be very careful in accepting data to be relied upon by it. The appellant was engaged in the bntcher's trade and he mainly E slaughtered

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)