Supreme Court · 2011 INSC 245 · Decided 30 March 2011

Harjit Singh v. State of Punjab

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2011 INSC 245 · [2011] 5 S.C.R. 691
Case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 816/2011
Decided
30 March 2011
Bench
P. SATHASIVAM, B.S. CHAUHAN (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Dismissed
Case type
Criminal
Acts & sections cited
Constitution Article 20; NDPS Act Section 2, 8, 18

Headnote

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - ss. 2, 8 and 18 - Distinction between Opium and Morphine A B - Recovery of contraband - Conviction of accused-appellant C - Whether when the entire substance recovered is opium and not any kind of mixture, the question of determining the is relevant - Held: Morphine is one of the derivatives of the Opium - The requirement under the law is first to identify and o classify the recovered substance and then to find out under · what· entry it is required to be dealt with - If it is Opium as defined in clause (a) of

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)