Supreme Court · 2011 INSC 401 · Decided 13 May 2011
Harjit Singh Uppal v. Anup Bansal
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2011 INSC 401 · [2011] 15 S.C.R. 948
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 4416/2011
- Decided
- 13 May 2011
- Bench
- AFTAB ALAM, RAJENDRA MAL LODHA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 97; Rent Control Act
Headnote
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - ss. 15(1)(b) and 13(2)(i) provico - Eviction petition on the ground, c of default in payment of rent - Order by the Rent Controller determining the provisional rent uls. 13(2)(i) proviso - Tenant not availing his remedy to challenge the same by filing - Effect of - Held: It cannot be said that the order fixing provisional rent becomes final and cannot be challenged subsequently, D particularly, in the appeal challenging the order of eviction - s. 15(1)(b) does not make it imperative upon the person aggrieved to appeal from an
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)