Supreme Court · 2011 INSC 74 · Decided 27 January 2011
Hari Ram v. Jyoti Prasad & ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2011 INSC 74 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 1076
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1042/2011
- Decided
- 27 January 2011
- Bench
- MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, ANIL R. DAVE (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CrPC Section 133; CPC; Limitation Act Section 22, 3
Headnote
..,., Limitation Act, 1963 - s.22 - Suit filed allegin~ that the c defendants had illegally encroached on a public street - Trial court decreed the suit and issued permanent injunction - Decree challenged on the ground that the suit itself was barred by limitation - Held: The suit could not be on a public-Street is a D continuing wrong and therefore, there existed a continuing cause of action - S.22 of the Limitation Act would appJ.y - ~ .. Code of Civil Procedure, . 1908. -- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: E Order I Rule 8 - Suit filed alleging that the defendants had made
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)