Supreme Court · 2000 INSC 296 · Decided 5 May 2000
Haresh Dayaram Thakur v. State of Maharashtra and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2000 INSC 296 · [2000] 3 S.C.R. 1140
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 3247/2000
- Decided
- 5 May 2000
- Bench
- D.P. MOHAPATRA, R.P. SETHI (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Evidence Act; Arbitration Act
Headnote
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, I996-Part III-Conciliation pro­ ceedings-When final-Held, successful conciliation pmceeding comes to an end only when the settlement agreement signed by the parties comes into C existence-And such agreement has the status and effect of legal sanctity of an prescribed under the Act-Whether correct-Held, No-If the statute pre­ scribes a procedure fer doing a thing, a thing has to be done according to that procedure. In a writ petition filed before High Court, conciliator was appointed with regard to the disputes between the parties. The
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)