Supreme Court · 1996 INSC 659 · Decided 9 May 1996
H.U.D.A. and Anr v. Kewal Krishan Goel and Other ETC.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1996 INSC 659 · [1996] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 587
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 7849/1996
- Decided
- 9 May 1996
- Bench
- K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
Haryana Urban Development Authority Rules-Allotment of lan~Withdrawal by allottee due to incapacity to pa:r-Refund of mone:r-Held, competent authority can fo1feit eamest money. Words & Phrases-'Eamest'--Meaning of The Haryana Urban Development Authority offered certain residen· A B c along with the application as earnest money. On receipt of letter allotment, each allottee was required to indicate whether he was D accepting the offer or refusing the same within 30 days from the date of receipt. In case of acceptance, the allottee was further required to make ~n additional
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)