Supreme Court · 2010 INSC 338 · Decided 3 June 2010

Fuljit Kaur v. State of Punjab & ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2010 INSC 338 · [2010] 7 S.C.R. 317
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 5292/2004
Decided
3 June 2010
Bench
B.S. CHAUHAN, SWATANTER KUMAR (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Dismissed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Constitution Article 136; Land Acquisition Act

Headnote

. Punjab Urban Estate (Sale of Sites) Rules, 1965: A B rr. 2(aaj, 2(e), 4, 5-A - 'Additional price', 'tentative price', c 'sale price' and 'liability to pay additional price' - 'Provisional . price' and 'tentative price' - Connotation of - Allotment of plot in haste - Allottee asked. to deposit raised for additional price - High Court upholding the demand notice - HELD: There is a 0 difference between 'provisional price' and 'tentative price' and it may take a long time for the State to determine the tentative price - There is nothing in the scheme of the Act or the Rules indicating that

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)