Supreme Court · 2013 INSC 561 · Decided 26 August 2013

Econ Antri LTD. v. Rom Industries LTD. & ANR.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2013 INSC 561 · [2013] 14 S.C.R. 74
Case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1079/2006
Decided
26 August 2013
Bench
P. SATHASIVAM, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, RANJAN GOGOI (3-judge bench)
Outcome
Reference answered
Case type
Criminal
Acts & sections cited
NI Act Section 142, 138, 142(b), 138(a); Limitation Act Section 9

Headnote

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - s.142(b} and s.138, C proviso (c) - Cheque bouncing case- Complaint filed u!s.138 of NI Act - Limitation period - One month period prescribed u/s. 142(b} of NI Act - Manner of calculation - Held: The period should be reckoned by excluding date on arose - Where a particular time is given, from a D certain date, within which an act is to be done, the day of the date is to be excluded - Inapplicability of the Limitation Act - General Clauses Act, 1897 - s.9 - Limitation Act, 1963. Words and Phrases - words 'of, 'from' and 'after'. E The

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)