Supreme Court · 1990 INSC 211 · Decided 24 July 1990

DR. Lakshmansingh Himatsingh Vaghele v. Naresh Kumar Chandrashankar Jha and ANR.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1990 INSC 211 · [1990] 3 S.C.R. 511
Case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 387/1990
Decided
24 July 1990
Bench
T.K. THOMMEN, KULDIP SINGH, M. FATHIMA BEEVI (3-judge bench)
Outcome
Dismissed
Case type
Criminal
Acts & sections cited
IPC Section 465, 468, 201, 21; CrPC Section 197, 197(1); Companies Act Section 617

Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure 1973-Section 197-Sanction to prosecute-When necessary for-'Pub/ic servant'-'Pub/ic analyst'­ Sanction to prosecute-Whether necessary. The appellant, an employee of the Municipal Corporation Ahmedabad was holding the post of Laboratory Officer and while he was so issued b) the State Government, was appointed as a Public Analyst for the local area within the municipal limits of the Corporation. The respondent filed a complaint before the Magistrate for offences punishable under Sec­ tions 465, 468 and 201, I.P.C. alleged to have been committed by

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)