Supreme Court · 1980 INSC 123 · Decided 9 May 1980

Deputy Commissioner, Sales Tax (Law) Board of Revenue (Taxes) Ernakulam v. Pio Food Packers

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1980 INSC 123 · [1980] 3 S.C.R. 1271
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 2398/1978
Decided
9 May 1980
Bench
P.N. BHAGWATI, V.D. TULZAPURKAR, R.S. PATHAK (3-judge bench)
Outcome
Dismissed
Case type
Civil

Headnote

Kera/a General Sales Tax Act, Section 5-A(l)(a) "conmmes such goods in the malrufacture of other goods for sale or otherwise", meaning of-ExigibiliJy to tax of pineapple ffuit. when processed into slices for the purpose of being IO!d in sealed cans. ·-..; Tho respondent assessee, of manu­ . facturing and selling canned fruit besides other products. The Pineapple pur­ chased by the assessee is washed and then the inedible portion, tbe end crown, skin· and inner core are removed, thereafter the fruit is, sliced and the slices are filled in cans, sugar is

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)