Supreme Court · 2000 INSC 182 · Decided 3 April 2000
Deep Chand and ORS. v. Mohan Lal
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2000 INSC 182 · [2000] 2 S.C.R. 890
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 2356/2000
- Decided
- 3 April 2000
- Bench
- S. SAGHIR AHMAD, R.P. SETHI (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Limitation Act Section 136
Headnote
limitation Act, 1963 : Article 136. Decree Execution of-Period of limitation-Decree became enfon::eable only after execution of sale deed-Held : Generally a decree becomes enfon::e­ able from its date but court may prescribe in appropriate cases of future date from which the decree becomes decree becomes enforr:eable-Hence, application for execution of decree filed within 12 years after execution of sale deed maintainable. Decree Execution of-General principles-Held: Executing court should no, find ways to dismiss the execttiion application as barred by time unless such an
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)