Supreme Court · 2001 INSC 292 · Decided 11 July 2001
Deena Nath v. Pooran Lal
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2001 INSC 292 · [2001] 3 S.C.R. 925
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 4041/2021
- Decided
- 11 July 2001
- Bench
- D.P. MOHAPATRA, U.C. BANERJEE (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 100; Constitution
Headnote
Rent Control & Eviction Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961-Section 12(1)(/)- Eviction-Bona fide requirement of landlord-Suit premises is one of the five shops owned by landlord-One vacant shop room in occupation of landlord at the time of filing of suit-Pending proceedings one more Court-Second appeal-High Court holding that sufficient alternative accommodation was available with the landlord. Setting aside concurrent findings of Courts below-Justification of- Held, Court is duty bound to examine not merely the requirement of landlord, but also availability of other
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)