Supreme Court · 2001 INSC 96 · Decided 20 February 2001
Daya Singh v. State of Haryana
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2001 INSC 96 · [2001] 1 S.C.R. 1115
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 416/1998
- Decided
- 20 February 2001
- Bench
- M.B. SHAH, K.G. BALAKRISHNAN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 302, 307, 34
Headnote
B Indian Penal Code, 1860-Sections 302 & 307-Terrorists and Disruptive Activities Act. 1987-Sections 3 & 5-Conviction under Sustainability of-Identification of the appel/a111 by two eye-witnesses during trial Failure of other eye-witnesses to identifo the appellant-Corroboration C of the in holding test identification parade-Held, conviction sustainable. Criminal Trial-Test identification-Purpose of Is to have, corroboration to the evidence of the eyewitnesses in the form of earlier identification-If D substantive evidence of a witness in the court is found to be reliable, then
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)