Supreme Court · 2013 INSC 761 · Decided 19 November 2013
Daljit Kaur and ANR. v. Muktar Steels PVT. LTD.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2013 INSC 761 · [2013] 17 S.C.R. 1043
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 10755/2013
- Decided
- 19 November 2013
- Bench
- ANIL R. DAVE, DIPAK MISRA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 96(3)
Headnote
Code of Civil Proce.dure, 1908- s. 96(3) and OrderXL/11 A B r. 1 A. - Appeal against consent decree - Maintainability - Held: When decree is passed on the basis of compromise 'C without raising any dispute to the compromise, appea(.would not be maintainable - But if the decree is passed after validity of the compromise, decree cannot be called consent decree, and hence appeal would be maintainable - In the facts of the present case, the D High Court rightly held that the decree was consent decree. ' Appellant No.1-Plaintiff filed a suit against the respondents-defendants. During
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)