Supreme Court · 2001 INSC 388 · Decided 23 August 2001
Dadi Jagannadham v. Jammulu Ramulu and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2001 INSC 388 · [2001] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 60
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 5639/2001
- Decided
- 23 August 2001
- Bench
- A.S. ANAND, K.T. THOMAS, R.C. LAHOTI, N. SANTOSH HEGDE, S.N. VARIAVA (5-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 127; Limitation Act Section 21, 127
Headnote
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908/Limitation Act, 1963: Order 21, Rules 89 and 92(2)/Article I 27-Applicationfor setting aside sale-Period of limitation to make deposit under Rule 92(2)-Held, an application under Order 2 I, Rule 89 can be made within 60 days from the date of sale, as provided under as no period for making deposit is prescribed under Rule 92(2), deposit can also be made D within 60 days from the date of sale. Interpretation of Statutes: Construction of statute-Held, Court must, as far as possible adopt a construction which will carry out the obvious intention of
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)