Supreme Court · 2010 INSC 696 · Decided 8 October 2010
D.R. Rathna Murthy v. Ramappa
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2010 INSC 696 · [2010] 12 S.C.R. 755
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 6396/2002
- Decided
- 8 October 2010
- Bench
- P. SATHASIVAM, B.S. CHAUHAN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
Deeds and documents.· A B Document containing interlineations or alterations - Suit c land sold by registered sale deed - After few years, vendor seeking re-purchase of land by claiming that the sale by him was conditional - Jn the sale deed, the word 'avadhi' was inserted in three places the last part of the sale deed to make it 0 conditional - Held: Rule 42 mandatorily requires that if there is any interlineations, erasures, alterations etc., it must be mentioned and described at the foot of the document and must be duly signed by the executant before the document is accepted
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)