Supreme Court · 2009 INSC 781 · Decided 8 May 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur, Rajasthan v. Mcdowell & CO. LTD.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2009 INSC 781 · [2009] 8 S.C.R. 983
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 2939/2006
Decided
8 May 2009
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Disposed off
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Income Tax Act

Headnote

Income Tax Act, 1961: c s.438 - Unpaid amount of bottling fee on furnishing of thei bank guarantee, not to be treated as actual payment and not entitled to deduction u/s.438. . " l D Bottling fees chargeable from assessee under the Rules frnmed under the interest chargeable on late payment of bottling fees does not amount to tax, duty, cess or fees within the meaning s.438. Depreciation on research and development assets which E related to the closed business of fast food division/unit of the .../ as.sessee-company and as such not used during the

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)