Supreme Court · 1960 INSC 94 · Decided 28 April 1960
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Ahmedabad· v. Karamchand Premchand LTD., Ahmedabad
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1960 INSC 94 · [1960] 3 S.C.R. 727
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 307/1958
- Decided
- 28 April 1960
- Bench
- S.K. DAS, J.L. KAPUR, M. HIDAYATULLAH (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 727 arbitration they did not anticipate the complications which have subsequently arisen. That is why an arbitration agreement may have been introduced in the contract in question. All these facts have been considered by both the courts, and though it is true vested in them should be exercised in not granting stay as claimed by the appellant. Under these circumstances we do not think we would be justified in substituting our discretion for that of the courts below. It may be that if we were trying the appellant's application under s. 34 we
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)