Supreme Court · 2013 INSC 28 · Decided 10 January 2013
Chinnam Kameswara Rao and ORS. v. State of AP. REP. BY Home Secretary
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2013 INSC 28 · [2013] 2 S.C.R. 631
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1116/2011
- Decided
- 10 January 2013
- Bench
- T.S. THAKUR, GYAN SUDHA MISRA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 302, 324, 34; CrPC Section 386
Headnote
A B Penal Code, 1860 - ss. 302 and 324 rlw s. 34 - Prosecution under - Injured victim and 4 others eye­ witnesses - Incident in question was sequel to an incident on C previous day, wherein the deceased was threatened by accused of dire consequences - Acquittal by trial court - Conviction by The conviction was justified in view of depositions of injured victim and other eye­ witnesses - Facts of the case prove that the incident was D premeditated - Absence of charge uls. 34 would not affect the legality of conviction, as such omission caused no prejudice to the accused. Code of
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)