Supreme Court · 2003 INSC 106 · Decided 19 February 2003

Chandramohan Ramchandra Patil and ORS. v. Bapu Koyappa Patil (Dead) Through LRS. and ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2003 INSC 106 · [2003] 2 S.C.R. 203
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 9393/1995
Decided
19 February 2003
Bench
BRIJESH KUMAR, D.M. DHARMADHIKARI (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Dismissed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
CPC Section 100; Evidence Act Section 30(5), 50

Headnote

RAMCHANDRA PATIL AND ORS. A v. BAPU KOY APP A PATIL (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. FEBRUARY 19, 2003 [BRIJESH KUMAR AND D.M. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ.) B . , \ Hindu Law: Suit for partition of Watan/lnam lands-Dismissed by Trial Court- c Reversed by First Appellate Court-High Court recognised.the and it was upheld by High Court-Hence evidence ~ of pedigree is relevant and thus prove relationship of the plaintiff with the ancestorllnamdar-When the predecessor-in-title of the defendant became D Watandar, the possession of suit land cannot be held to be adverse to the other member of the

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)