Supreme Court · 1954 INSC 88 · Decided 12 October 1954
Central Bank of India v. Ram Narain
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1954 INSC 88 · [1955] 1 S.C.R. 697
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 90/1952
- Decided
- 12 October 1954
- Bench
- MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA, VIVIAN BOSE, B. JAGANNADHADAS, T.L. VENKATARAMA AIYYAR (5-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 4, 380, 454; CrPC Section 4, 188; Constitution Article 134(1)(c)
Headnote
COURT REPORTS 697 which declares that none of the provlSlons of the specified Acts shall be deemed to be void or ever to have become void on the ground of the alleged violation of the rights indicated and "notwithstanding any judg­ ment, decree or order of any court or tribunal." Vve are, therefore, clearly of the opinion that the challenge to the validity of the Bombay Taluqdari Tenure Abolition Act, 1949 on the ground put forward was not open. The appeals must, therefore, be dismissed with costs. Costs one set. Appeals dismissed. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA v. RAM
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)