Supreme Court · 2016 INSC 1152 · Decided 16 December 2016
C.I.T. & Anr v. Mis Yokogawa India LTD
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2016 INSC 1152 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 163
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 8498/2013
- Decided
- 16 December 2016
- Bench
- RANJAN GOGOI, PRAFULLA C. PANT (2-judge bench)
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
iii I I I II ! i !. ii I /1111 11 ll I! ii Ill i illll i/11 i '"I I -------~~- 162 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 9 S.C.R. A increments. It is only the regularisation in service which would entail grant of increments etc. in the pay-scale. 24. In view of the aforesaid, we do not find any Government while fixing the pay scale, granted increments as well. However, if some peisons are given the benefit wrongly, that cannot fonn the basis of claiming the same relief. It is trite that right to equality under Article 14 is not in negative terms (See Indian Council of A1:ricultural
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)