Supreme Court · 1973 INSC 141 · Decided 16 August 1973

C.I.T. Bombay v. Onkarmal Meghraj (H.U.F.) & ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1973 INSC 141 · [1974] 1 S.C.R. 391
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 2263/1969
Decided
16 August 1973
Bench
HANS RAJ KHANNA, A. ALAGIRISWAMI (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Disposed off
Case type
Civil

Headnote

Indian Income Tax (Amendment) Act 1953-S. 34(3)-11$ scope. 391 16 person'1:i constituted a partnership firm under an agreement dated 19-5- 1930. Out' of the 16 partners, 3 were outsiders and 13 were members of 3 Hinclu Undivided Families. Though the firm. consisted of 3 Hindu Undivided Families, to 1941-42, the Income Tax Department asseosed the 13 persons not as individuals but as 3 Hindu Undivided Families. on the basis of a settle­ ment between them and the department. After 1941-42, all the 16 personS were to be individually assessed. Nevertheless, the Income Tax Officer

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)